As things 
always do with Lesnar, a recent interview with ESPN turned to him 
comparing the WWE to the UFC. While the initial question was a lame 
attempt to stir debate about the fake vs. real argument, the interview 
led to a comparison between two iconic promoters of our time: Vince 
McMahon and Dana White. (Dana White's past comments on McMahon and WWE.)
White,
 the UFC’s president, was involved in a recent Twitter exchange with a 
fan in which he called professional wrestling fake. Not exactly breaking
 news, we know.
But in addressing the comments 
about fake vs. real, Lesnar put things in a business perspective, which 
eventually led to the comparison between McMahon, his current WWE boss, 
and White, his former boss.
“Of
 course, Dana, it's fake, everybody knows that, but you're promoting the
 same thing we're promoting. Dana White is promoting fights; we're 
promoting fights,” said Lesnar. “It just so happens that we get a little
 more longevity out of our fights and out of our fighters because of the
 circumstances.”
The 
circumstances being that the WWE, being scripted, can better control the
 story building up to a match and can determine the outcome, which can 
be expanded upon at will to keep the storyline going to peak interest.
Lesnar, of course, wasn’t referring to the way the fights play out. Unlike Wanderlei Silva, who, without providing any supporting evidence, recently claimed that the UFC has fixed fights, Lesnar was referring to WWE and UFC both being in the business of promoting and selling pay-per-view events.
“The business model's the same. 
It's identical,” said Lesnar. “I think Vince McMahon is better at it 
than Dana and that might rub Dana the wrong way.
“Vince is the pioneer of it. He's been doing this his whole life and he's damn good at it.”
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment